Tubantia Borgerhout vs K Beerschot VAC analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of each margin of victory
23.4%
Win probability
1.4
Expected goals
6-0
<0%
7-1
<0%
+6
<0%
5-0
0.1%
6-1
0.1%
7-2
<0%
+5
0.2%
4-0
0.4%
5-1
0.3%
6-2
0.1%
7-3
<0%
+4
0.8%
3-0
1.2%
4-1
0.9%
5-2
0.3%
6-3
0.1%
+3
2.5%
2-0
2.6%
3-1
2.7%
4-2
1.1%
5-3
0.2%
6-4
<0%
+2
6.6%
1-0
3.7%
2-1
5.8%
3-2
3%
4-3
0.8%
5-4
0.1%
6-5
<0%
+1
13.4%
20.1%
Draw
0-0
2.6%
1-1
8.2%
2-2
6.5%
3-3
2.2%
4-4
0.4%
5-5
0.1%
0
20.1%
56.5%
Win probability
2.24
Expected goals
0-1
5.9%
1-2
9.2%
2-3
4.8%
3-4
1.3%
4-5
0.2%
5-6
0%
-1
21.4%
0-2
6.6%
1-3
6.9%
2-4
2.7%
3-5
0.6%
4-6
0.1%
-2
16.8%
0-3
4.9%
1-4
3.9%
2-5
1.2%
3-6
0.2%
4-7
0%
-3
10.2%
0-4
2.8%
1-5
1.7%
2-6
0.5%
3-7
0.1%
-4
5%
0-5
1.2%
1-6
0.6%
2-7
0.1%
3-8
0%
-5
2%
0-6
0.5%
1-7
0.2%
2-8
0%
-6
0.7%
0-7
0.1%
1-8
0.1%
2-9
0%
-7
0.2%
0-8
0%
1-9
0%
-8
0.1%
0-9
0%
-9
<0%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
Tubantia Borgerhout
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Feb. 1932 |
TBF
5 - 3
UNI
39%
22%
40%
|
65 | 73 | 8 | 0 |
| 07 Feb. 1932 |
KVM
1 - 2
TBF
74%
14%
12%
|
64 | 76 | 12 | +1 |
| 31 Jan. 1932 |
TBF
1 - 3
LIE
39%
22%
39%
|
65 | 75 | 10 | -1 |
| 24 Jan. 1932 |
GEN
5 - 2
TBF
60%
19%
22%
|
66 | 66 | 0 | -1 |
| 17 Jan. 1932 |
TBF
0 - 2
BRU
41%
21%
38%
|
67 | 73 | 6 | -1 |
Matches
K Beerschot VAC
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Feb. 1932 |
BEE
6 - 1
KVM
71%
16%
13%
|
87 | 75 | 12 | 0 |
| 07 Feb. 1932 |
GEN
3 - 0
BEE
38%
23%
39%
|
87 | 66 | 21 | 0 |
| 31 Jan. 1932 |
BEE
1 - 1
BER
72%
16%
12%
|
87 | 77 | 10 | 0 |
| 24 Jan. 1932 |
UNI
1 - 0
BEE
40%
23%
37%
|
87 | 71 | 16 | 0 |
| 17 Jan. 1932 |
BEE
3 - 3
ANT
64%
19%
17%
|
87 | 84 | 3 | 0 |